Skip Navigation
A | A | A
Bookmark this page
Print This Page


Ann Davison, CAE
Strategic Information Manager
703–537-4829
adavison@iafc.org

New Study Evaluates Effectiveness of Crew Sizes in High Rise Fires

April 10, 2013

A major new study released today by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), concludes that firefighting crews of five or six members—instead of three or four—are significantly faster in putting out fires and completing search-and-rescue operations when responding to fires in high-rise buildings.

"Unlike most house fires, high-rise fires are high-hazard situations that pose unique operational challenges to fire service response. How big a fire gets and how much danger it poses to occupants and firefighters are largely determined by crew size and how personnel are deployed at the scene," says lead researcher Jason Averill, a NIST fire-protection engineer. "It's not simply that larger crews have more people. Larger crews are deployed differently and, as a result, are able to perform required tasks more quickly."

The Report on High Rise Fireground Filed Experiments (pdf) explores the outcome of the fireground experiments, funded by the FEMA Assistance to Firefighters Grants Program and conducted in a 13-story vacant high-rise office building in Crystal City, Va., with the support of local-area fire departments. The study involved 48 separate controlled experiments, plus 48 corresponding computer-modeling simulations, which evaluated three types of representative fires, from slow- to fast-growing.

The report is the latest in a series of firefighter safety and deployment studies conducted by NIST, the International Association of Fire Fighters, and four other organizations, including the IAFC.

In an analysis of 14 critical tasks, the study found that three-member crews took almost 12 minutes longer than crews of four, 21 minutes longer than crews of five and 23 minutes longer than crews of six to complete all tasks. Four-person crews took 9 minutes and 11 minutes longer than five- and six-member crews did, respectively.

On the basis of the results of computer modeling, which incorporated data from live experimental burns, the study team concluded that smaller crews end up facing larger fires because of the additional time required to complete tasks.

The study also looked at the effect of using fire service access elevators to move firefighters and equipment up to the staging floor and concluded that most tasks were started two to four minutes faster when using the elevators compared with using the stairs.

The study also explores such variables as the effect of using fire service access elevators to move firefighters and equipment up to the staging floor and the differences in sounding a higher initial alarm with smaller crews vs. low-alarm response with larger crews.

While much less frequent than house fires, about 43 high-rise fires occur in the United States every day, according to the NFPA.

"Rather than providing a one-size-fits-all answer, our study provides a scientific basis for discussions in communities as they consider matching resources deployed to their particular risk levels." says Averill.

Download the Report on High Rise Fireground Filed Experiments (pdf) or read the complete NIST press release: Landmark High-Rise Fire Study Evaluates Effectiveness of Crew Sizes, Elevator Use.

About the International Association of Fire Chiefs (IAFC)
The IAFC represents the leadership of firefighters and emergency responders worldwide. IAFC members are the world's leading experts in firefighting, emergency medical services, terrorism response, hazardous materials spills, natural disasters, search and rescue, and public safety legislation. Since 1873, the IAFC has provided a forum for its members to exchange ideas, develop professionally and uncover the latest products and services available to first responders.